openbiblio.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Der Einstieg in das Fediverse für Bibliotheksmenschen

Administered by:

Server stats:

627
active users

Hey @edsu
just read, watched & enjoyed inkdroid.org/2015/05/20/skos-a #wikidata
Personally I am also using #SKOS cause of the skohub.io approach @acka47

What I wonder about:
Can't we say in SKOS:
- This wikidata property wd:P… is the same than this skos:Concept
or
- This skos:Concept is described by wikidata entity wd:Q…

Basically my software maps Linked Data and other SKOS in this way but how about wikidata or even non-LD-APIs ?
Does anybody know, what is the best way to describe such ?

inkdroid.orgSKOS and Wikidata

@sl007 @acka47 I'm not sure I understand the question. It might help to see some examples.

@edsu @acka47

The concrete example is that we have published the first part of the Vocabulary at the page redaktor.github.io/vocab/
following the skohub.io approach.

What I would now like to express in the turtle files in huge github.com/redaktor/vocab/blob is e.g.
for a movie Director:

concept 012011
can appear as wikidata property
P57

or

concept 012011
is described by wikidata entity
Q3455803

@sl007 @acka47 ok, I understand now, and I don't know the answer. I think in semweb land that pushes into reification, which was never something I really understood very well.

Is there a reason why you wouldn't want to use one of the skos:mappingRelation to link to wikidata.org/wiki/Q3455803 instead?

www.wikidata.orgdirectordirector of a creative work

@edsu @acka47

Because the SKOS spcs. said “By convention, the SKOS mapping properties are only used to link concepts in different concept schemes.”
but I would like to link SKOS with a Link and not a "different concept scheme".
Maybe got something wrong.

@sl007 @acka47 would it be bad to infer that Wikidata is a concept scheme? It looks like the Library of Congress doesn't think so, e.g.

id.loc.gov/authorities/subject

I haven't kept track of how other people are linking to Wikidata from SKOS. It seems like if you did you'd want to link to something that's a resource and not a property?

@edsu @acka47

It seems like if you did you'd want to link to something that's a resource and not a property?

Well, both.
Linking resources for public, but also telling my ActivityPub software internally which wd property maps to e.g. which LOC relator.

Adrian

@sl007 @edsu For linking skos:Concepts to things, there is foaf:focus. We use it for example in nwbib.de/spatial

@edsu @sl007 Yes, linking SKOS concepts to properties seems incorrect but I understand why Sebastian would like to add a link to the property. I don't know of a property made for this. Of course you can always add it to the skos:definition for humans to see the relation. Or you create your own property to state this relation...