@Alice #me #too

ok let's try it

The difference between a "beginner AI" and an "advanced AI" , from the perspective of delivering services to users, is almost surely near negligible. Which means what they are actually describing here is their intention to purposely cripple the good AI and sell it to the poors for cheaper.

That's shitty behavior. You charge more for a legitimately better thing that costs your company more, in some way, to deliver. That's how pricing is supposed to work. What they're describing here is called monopoly pricing (but they don't have monopoly power yet).

You can already see the seeds of evil they're trying to plant here. When people tell you who they are, believe them. Avoid Kagi. Don't use it. Don't pay them.

Kagi will run the AI. Not you. The incentives that matter here are Kagi's--computer software does not and cannot have incentives.

Kagi's incentives will be to keep you paying for the AI. That is not aligned with your interests, by definition.

Their blog post is lying, and they know it. This is not a trustworthy company. Do not pay them. We can do better than yet another corporate data hoarder.

"The Age of PageRank is Over"

https://blog.kagi.com/age-pagerank-over

Uh hi, #Kagi ? You do know that PageRank is (was?) AI, right? Like. Do you know what you're saying here (probably not)?

But there will also be search companions with different abilities offered at different price points. Depending on your budget and tolerance, you will be able to buy beginner, intermediate, or expert AIs.

In the future, instead of everyone sharing the same search engine, you’ll have your completely individual, personalized Mike or Julia or Jarvis - the AI. Instead of being scared to share information with it, you will volunteer your data, knowing its incentives align with yours.

Kagi's vision of the AI search future is horrifying. #kagi #is #bad #too

@lowqualityfacts #ugh #finally #is #it #too #much #to #ask?